Skip to main content

A Postquantum Theory of Classical Gravity? by Jonathan Oppenheim

I guess the important people in these circles do not sensate is this, that light defies gravity, or modifies it. Hamilonian QFT is still not fully understood by me, but I get the Noether's and Wick's part of it. I do not want to sound precocious or Goodwill hunting but the matter is that calling Einstein classical is correct and using Quantum computing to postulate a successful QFT is the simple step pending. 


Edit - there is a promising at start academic essay by Philip Kurien on Particle stuff. It's on my public Zotero.

https://www.zotero.org/darkswordreams/library


There is a cool Bengaluru based Meetup group in India. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

promising geochemistry

 I get a kick from Isotopic stuff, and this is even better Barium Isotope Fingerprint for Recycled Ancient Sediment in the Source of EM1‐Type Continental Basalts Yi‐Shan Cheng1,2, Jian‐Qiang Liu1 , Li‐Hui Chen1 , Kai‐Yun Chen1, Jian Zhao1 , Xiao‐Jun Wang1, Gang Zeng3 , and Hong‐Fu Zhang2
Post a Comment
Read more

after hopfield and the everest man who got the nobel, this is one real deal, the MS side of AI, which has not happened beyond maybe MS Start app (copilot is good at visuals)

  github.com/microsoft/BitNet Edit years later - here is the ring that fools them all  https://github.com/computerhistory/AlexNet-Source-Code Here is a scary Blue Meta thing that Uniprot led me to https://github.com/facebookresearch/esm
Post a Comment
Read more